I need to go back to the year 1955. I think Biff stole my sports almanac. I need to set things right again! Any imput would be appreciated.
-
No, and contrary to Anand's answer, there are plenty of laws of physics that prevent it happening. Travel backwards in time would involve the violation of several principals. Firstly, the laws of conservation of angular momentum. The planet would not be in the same place in it's orbit as you left it. It would also violate the laws of conservation of matter and energy, to say nothing of the laws of cause and effect. Just because the Einstein Field Equations work just as well in a time reversal situation does mean it is a possibility. Yes, I know you were joking just as another, somewhat incoherent answer hinted, but many people on here believe everything they read, so I just pointed out the facts. All that will happen if you spin round is that you will get dizzy and fall over. A similar, but more pleasurable effect can be obtained from a couple of slugs of Bourbon.
-
Most people think that time travel is impossible. But believe it or not ! There isn't any law in physics preventing time travel. Time is like a meandering river flowing around planets, celestial bodies, which can have wormholes.
Stephen Hawking once suggested that the absence of tourists from the future is an argument against the existence of time travel—a variant of the Fermi paradox. Of course this would not prove that time travel is physically impossible, since it might be that time travel is physically possible but that it is never developed (or is cautiously never used); and even if it is developed, Hawking notes elsewhere that time travel might only be possible in a region of spacetime that is warped in the correct way, and that if we cannot create such a region until the future, then time travelers would not be able to travel back before that date, so "This picture would explain why we haven't been over run by tourists from the future." Carl Sagan also once suggested the possibility that time travelers could be here, but are disguising their existence or are not recognized as time travelers...
Stephen Hawking once suggested that the absence of tourists from the future is an argument against the existence of time travel—a variant of the Fermi paradox. Of course this would not prove that time travel is physically impossible, since it might be that time travel is physically possible but that it is never developed (or is cautiously never used); and even if it is developed, Hawking notes elsewhere that time travel might only be possible in a region of spacetime that is warped in the correct way, and that if we cannot create such a region until the future, then time travelers would not be able to travel back before that date, so "This picture would explain why we haven't been over run by tourists from the future." Carl Sagan also once suggested the possibility that time travelers could be here, but are disguising their existence or are not recognized as time travelers...
-
No. You would have to spin faster then astronauts in the centrifuge, where your eyes pop out of your skull, and you have to wear a pressure suit so that your blood vessels don't burst! Really unpleasant stuff!
-
No
Try this:
Spin around 5 times,
Say "i shall not troll on yahoo answers" 5 times.
Now spin around again 5 times.
Now go to bed.
Try this:
Spin around 5 times,
Say "i shall not troll on yahoo answers" 5 times.
Now spin around again 5 times.
Now go to bed.
-
yes it is true but you will have to spin 360 degrees 1955 times
-
totally agree with you
-
Im laughing at da fact ur question requires an DeLoren and its stupid. Plus how this guy^ answers so seriously xD
-
No.
Now go to bed.
Now go to bed.
-
You will fly apart.
-
i concur