Whether you consider light to be a wave or a particle depends on the application.For black holes gravitational effects on light, you would use the particle properties of light.-it is not necessary that gravity should act only on substances that have mass.and if the gravity is so dense, light gets sucked in by black holes.......
your question is the fundamental thought of general theory of relativity... so therefore really a good one..
though there is no conclusive thought on whether light is a particle with mass or a wave... it has given us a new way of looking at universe.. probably reading the link i have posted below may help u little bit
Light is a peculiar thing...
It has some properties of a wave.
It has some properties of a particle.
Whether you consider light to be a wave or a particle depends on the application.
For black holes gravitational effects on light, you would use the particle properties of light.
it is not necessary that gravity should act only on substances that have mass.and if the gravity is so dense, light gets sucked in by black holes.
Yes.. you made a mistake. 1. your definition is flaw. check again. for a better definition.
the same apply for the force of gravity..
Because humans are primitive and have no clue what forces are really at work inside a black hole. Most of modern science regarding space is hypothesis. A black hole is something humans will probably never be able to fully explain.
