Evolution is just a theory. I would rather follow the Biblical Law of Creation so why do they make fun of me
Favorites|Homepage
Subscriptions | sitemap
HOME > > Evolution is just a theory. I would rather follow the Biblical Law of Creation so why do they make fun of me

Evolution is just a theory. I would rather follow the Biblical Law of Creation so why do they make fun of me

[From: ] [author: ] [Date: 12-04-13] [Hit: ]
com/transference-count…...Youve been told that evolution is just a theory, a guess, a hunch,......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychologic…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferenc…

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sacr…

http://www.enotes.com/transference-count…

"...You've been told that "evolution is just a theory", a guess, a hunch, and not a fact, not proven. You've been misled. Keep reading, and in less than two minutes from now you'll know that you've been misinformed. We're not going to try and change your mind about evolution. We just want to point out that "it's just a theory" is not a valid argument.

The Theory of Evolution is a theory, but guess what? When scientists use the word theory, it has a different meaning to normal everyday use.1 That's right, it all comes down to the multiple meanings of the word theory. If you said to a scientist that you didn't believe in evolution because it was "just a theory", they'd probably be a bit puzzled.

In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanation for our observations.2 It ties together all the facts about something, providing an explanation that fits all the observations and can be used to make predictions. In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation. It's as close to proven as anything in science can be.

Some people think that in science, you have a theory, and once it's proven, it becomes a law. That's not how it works. In science, we collect facts, or observations, we use laws to describe them, and a theory to explain them. You don't promote a theory to a law by proving it. A theory never becomes a law.

This bears repeating. A theory never becomes a law. In fact, if there was a hierarchy of science, theories would be higher than laws. There is nothing higher, or better, than a theory. Laws describe things, theories explain them. An example will help you to understand this. There's a law of gravity, which is the description of gravity. It basically says that if you let go of something it'll fall. It doesn't say why. Then there's the theory of gravity, which is an attempt to explain why. Actually, Newton's Theory of Gravity did a pretty good job, but Einstein's Theory of Relativity does a better job of explaining it. These explanations are called theories, and will always be theories. They can't be changed into laws, because laws are different things. Laws describe, and theories explain.
keywords: the,follow,they,Biblical,me,is,theory,make,Creation,rather,Evolution,of,just,so,Law,why,would,do,fun,Evolution is just a theory. I would rather follow the Biblical Law of Creation so why do they make fun of me
New
Hot
© 2008-2010 http://www.science-mathematics.com . Program by zplan cms. Theme by wukong .